This article is for Irish company directors, startup founders, and shareholders who need to understand how share issuance works and whether they should keep or remove pre-emption rights.
If you're planning to issue new shares, raise investment, or wondering why your ownership percentage might get diluted, this guide covers what pre-emption rights are, how they protect shareholders, and when startups typically remove them to speed up fundraising.
Key Takeaways
• Irish companies have automatic statutory pre-emption rights unless specifically removed through their constitution or shareholder vote.
• Most startups remove pre-emption rights early to avoid the mandatory 14-day offer period that slows fundraising rounds.
• Issuing shares without following pre-emption rights allows shareholders to sue for damages and courts to cancel the issuance.
• Check your constitution, shareholders' agreements, and past resolutions before any share issue to determine what rights exist.
• Family businesses and equal partnerships should keep pre-emption rights to maintain control over who becomes a shareholder.

Pre-Emption Rights: What Are They and Do You Need Them?
What Are Pre-Emption Rights?
Pre-emption rights mean existing shareholders get first chance to buy new shares.
When your company issues new shares, current shareholders can buy them before outside investors.
This protects shareholders from having their ownership diluted without warning.
Think of it as a "first dibs" rule on any new shares.
Why Do Pre-Emption Rights Matter?
Without these rights, directors could issue shares to anyone and dilute your ownership instantly.
Here's what happens without protection.
You own 50% of a company with 100 shares total.
Directors issue 100 new shares to an investor.
You now own 50 shares out of 200 total.
Your ownership just dropped from 50% to 25% without you having any say.
With pre-emption rights, you'd get offered 50 of those new shares first.
You could buy them and stay at 50% ownership.
Or decline and accept the dilution - but it's your choice.
Are They Mandatory in Ireland?
Yes, unless your company specifically removes them.
The Companies Act gives all shareholders automatic pre-emption rights.
Directors can't ignore these rights - they're built into law.
But companies can remove these rights through their constitution or by shareholder vote.
How Do Pre-Emption Rights Actually Work?
The process follows specific steps when issuing new shares.
First, directors decide to issue new shares and set the price.
Second, they must offer shares to existing shareholders in writing.
Each shareholder gets offered shares proportional to their current ownership.
The offer must stay open for at least 14 days.
Third, shareholders accept or decline within that period.
Finally, any shares not taken by existing shareholders can be sold to outside investors.
The outside price must match or exceed the price offered to existing shareholders.
When Can You Remove Pre-Emption Rights?
There are three main ways to remove or bypass these rights.
Put it in your constitution from the start
Include provisions when you incorporate that remove pre-emption rights entirely.
Or allow directors to remove them when needed without asking shareholders each time.
Many startups do this to make fundraising faster later.
Pass a special resolution
Shareholders can vote to remove pre-emption rights for a specific share issue.
This needs 75% approval and only applies to that one issuance.
Give directors standing authority
Your constitution can let directors issue shares without pre-emption rights up to certain limits.
This typically needs renewal every few years by shareholder vote.
Why Startups Usually Remove These Rights
Most startups remove pre-emption rights quickly for practical reasons.
Speed matters in fundraising
The mandatory 14-day offer period slows down every funding round.
When an investor wants in, you can't wait two weeks offering shares to existing shareholders first.
Competitors might close their funding while you're still waiting.
Investors expect it
Venture capital investors won't wait for existing shareholders to consider their allocation.
They expect pre-emption rights to be waived before they invest.
It's standard in term sheets.
Administrative burden
With multiple shareholders, tracking who accepts, who declines, and managing partial acceptances creates serious work.
Most startups would rather close funding efficiently than manage this process.
When You Should Keep Pre-Emption Rights
Despite startup practice, these rights protect shareholders in certain situations.
Family businesses
Family companies often want control over who becomes a shareholder.
Pre-emption rights keep ownership decisions within the family.
Equal partnerships
If you have 50/50 or 33/33/34 ownership, these rights prevent one partner diluting the others.
They force agreement before new shareholders join.
Not raising investment
If you're not planning to fundraise, keep the default protection.
There's no downside to the 14-day delay when you're not in competitive situations.
Common Exemptions
Even when pre-emption rights exist, most companies carve out exceptions.
Employee share schemes
Shares issued to employees under option schemes are typically exempt.
Otherwise you'd offer every employee's shares to existing shareholders first.
This would make employee equity impossible to administer.
Share reorganizations
Converting share types or splitting shares doesn't trigger pre-emption rights.
These aren't real "new shares" - they're structural adjustments.
Specific investor categories
Some agreements exempt certain types of investors by prior agreement.
This might be negotiated when an investor joins and wants flexibility later.
What Happens If You Violate These Rights?
Ignoring pre-emption rights creates serious legal problems.
Affected shareholders can ask the court to cancel the share issuance.
They can sue for damages caused by the dilution.
Directors who authorized the breach can be personally liable.
Investors who received the shares may find their ownership challenged later.
This creates chaos when you try to raise more funding or sell the company.
Always check if pre-emption rights exist before issuing shares.
How to Check Your Company's Position
Before issuing any shares, determine what pre-emption rights exist.
Check your constitution
Look for sections about "issue of shares" or "pre-emption."
If it's silent, statutory rights apply automatically.
Check shareholders' agreements
Any shareholders' agreement might create additional pre-emption rights beyond the statutory minimum.
These must be followed even if statutory rights are removed.
Check past resolutions
Previous special resolutions disapplying rights typically only applied to specific past issuances.
Don't assume old resolutions cover your current planned share issue.
Pre-Emption Rights vs Right of First Refusal
These are different things that people often confuse.
Pre-emption rights apply when the company issues new shares.
Right of first refusal applies when a shareholder wants to sell their existing shares.
Most shareholder agreements include both to control new issuances and transfers.
Pre-Emption Rights and Fundraising
Understanding how these interact with funding rounds prevents problems.
In seed rounds, founders typically disapply pre-emption rights for the specific investment.
This is done by special resolution or constitutional authority.
The investor's shares are issued without offering them to founders first.
Later rounds work the same way for new investors.
But existing investors may have negotiated their own participation rights for future rounds.
These investor rights are contractual, not statutory, and often have more favorable terms than basic pre-emption rights.
Investors call these "pro-rata rights" - the ability to maintain their ownership percentage in future rounds.
The Practical Reality
Most Irish startups remove statutory pre-emption rights early.
They include constitutional provisions giving directors authority to issue shares without these rights.
This makes fundraising faster and simpler.
But they often give investors contractual participation rights in shareholders' agreements.
So rights are removed for founders but given to investors.
This reflects the reality that investors negotiate protections while founders prioritize speed.
Family businesses and non-fundraising companies typically keep the statutory protections in place.
The key is understanding what you're giving up and whether the speed benefits justify it.

Stuart Connolly is a corporate barrister in Ireland and the UK since 2012.
He spent over a decade at Ireland's top law firms including Arthur Cox & William Fry.













