This article is for Irish company directors and shareholders who need to understand how pre-emption rights work when issuing new shares or raising investment.
If you're wondering why existing shareholders get first refusal on new shares, how to bring in outside investors without violating these rights, or when you can legally override them, this guide covers the statutory requirements, how to disapply pre-emption rights for funding rounds, and the key differences between constitutional and contractual protections.
Key Takeaways
• Pre-emption rights require you to offer new shares to existing shareholders first, preventing dilution of their ownership stake without consent.
• You need a special resolution (75% shareholder approval) to disapply pre-emption rights for each specific share issuance.
• Constitutional disapplication of pre-emption rights must be renewed every five years through special resolution to remain effective.
• Most professional investors require pre-emption rights to be disapplied before closing investment deals to ensure share availability.
• Shareholder agreements can impose stricter contractual pre-emption rights that remain binding even after statutory rights are disapplied.
%20(2).webp)
What Are Pre-emption Rights in Practice?
Pre-emption rights mean existing shareholders get first chance to buy newly issued shares before anyone else can.
When your company plans to issue new shares for cash, it must offer those shares to current shareholders proportionate to their existing holdings.
Think of it like a members-only presale before tickets go on general sale.
How Do Pre-emption Rights Protect You?
These rights prevent your ownership stake from being diluted without your knowledge or consent.
If you own 30% of a company with 100 shares and the company issues 50 new shares, you have the right to buy 15 of those new shares to maintain your 30% ownership.
Without pre-emption rights, those 50 shares could go to a new investor, reducing your stake from 30% to 20% overnight.
Why Does Irish Law Favour Existing Shareholders?
The Companies Act 2014 recognises that share dilution significantly impacts shareholder value and control.
Statutory pre-emption rights exist because lawmakers understood that existing investors deserve protection from unexpected ownership changes.
This default position reflects a fundamental principle: people who invested in your company when it needed capital shouldn't lose their proportionate stake without opportunity to maintain it.
What Does the Law Actually Say?
The Companies Act sets out that private limited companies cannot allot shares for cash to non-members unless they first offer those shares to existing shareholders on the same or better terms.
Shareholders must receive proper notice in the same manner as general meeting notices. The offer must stay open for at least 14 days, giving shareholders reasonable time to consider whether to exercise their rights.
Pre-emption rights only trigger when shares are issued for cash consideration. This distinction matters because it determines when existing shareholders must receive offers and when the company has more flexibility.
Cash Issuances Requiring Pre-emption Offers
Any situation where someone pays money to receive shares typically triggers pre-emption rights.
This includes straightforward capital raises where new investors pay cash for equity stakes.
Convertible loan notes that convert into shares for their cash value also generally trigger these rights unless specifically excluded.
Non-Cash Issuances Exempt from Pre-emption
Share-for-share acquisitions where you're buying another company using your shares as currency don't trigger pre-emption rights.
Employee share option schemes and similar equity plans are also exempt, recognising that incentivising key team members serves all shareholders' interests.
Shares issued to settle debts or pay for services rendered may qualify as non-cash consideration, though proper valuation becomes essential.
How Do You Override Pre-emption Rights?
Companies have two main routes to disapply statutory pre-emption rights when business needs require flexibility.
Both options involve securing substantial shareholder support, recognising the significance of removing this protection.
Constitutional Disapplication
Your company constitution can include provisions that disapply statutory pre-emption rights entirely or for specific circumstances.
This approach requires approval when the constitution is adopted or amended, typically at incorporation or through special resolution.
Many companies include blanket disapplication provisions in their constitutions, particularly when they anticipate multiple funding rounds or complex share issuances.
However, this disapplication must be renewed every five years through special resolution to remain effective.
Special Resolution for Specific Issuances
If your constitution doesn't disapply pre-emption rights, you can pass a special resolution for a specific share allotment.
This requires approval from shareholders holding at least 75% of votes cast at a properly convened general meeting.
The resolution can only disapply rights for the specific issuance described, meaning you need a fresh special resolution for each subsequent share allotment.
What Happens When Bringing in New Investors?
Pre-emption rights create practical challenges when you're trying to raise capital from external investors.
New investors typically want certainty about the shares they'll receive and at what price, but pre-emption rights introduce uncertainty into these negotiations.
The Investment Round Dilemma
Imagine you've negotiated with a venture capital firm to invest €500,000 for 20% of your company.
If statutory pre-emption rights apply, you must first offer existing shareholders the opportunity to buy those shares on the same terms.
If existing shareholders exercise their rights, your VC investor might receive fewer shares or none at all, potentially killing the deal.
Typical Investor Requirements
Most professional investors require companies to disapply pre-emption rights before closing any investment:
- They want assurance that once terms are negotiated, those shares will actually be available for them to purchase
- This usually means obtaining a special resolution from existing shareholders approving the specific investment and disapplying pre-emption rights for that transaction
- Investors may also require constitutional amendments for future flexibility if they plan follow-on investments or if the company will need additional funding rounds
How Does This Work with Employee Share Schemes?
Employee share option plans and similar equity incentive schemes receive special treatment under pre-emption rules.
The law recognises that giving equity to employees benefits all shareholders by aligning team interests with company success.
Why Employee Schemes Are Exempt
Shares issued pursuant to employee share schemes don't trigger statutory pre-emption rights.
This exemption exists because requiring offers to existing shareholders would defeat the purpose of incentivising employees.
If existing shareholders could buy all the shares intended for employees, the motivational benefit would disappear entirely.
Setting Up Employee Schemes Properly
Even though statutory pre-emption rights don't apply to employee schemes, your constitution or shareholder agreements might still impose restrictions.
You should:
- Review all governing documents before establishing any employee equity program to ensure you're not violating contractual pre-emption rights
- Ensure you have properly drafted employee share schemes which explicitly state they're exempt from both statutory and contractual pre-emption provisions
What About Shareholder Agreements?
Shareholder agreements often include contractual pre-emption rights that are separate from and additional to statutory rights.
These contractual provisions can be more restrictive than the statutory minimum, creating additional layers of protection for investors.
Contractual vs Statutory Pre-emption
Statutory pre-emption rights only protect existing shareholders when new shares are issued.
Contractual pre-emption rights in shareholder agreements typically extend further, requiring shareholders to offer their existing shares to other shareholders before selling to outsiders.
This distinction matters because you might successfully disapply statutory pre-emption rights for a new share issuance but still face contractual restrictions on who can buy those shares.
Which Rights Take Precedence?
Both statutory and contractual pre-emption rights can apply simultaneously, with contractual rights often providing stricter limitations.
If you disapply statutory rights through special resolution but your shareholder agreement contains pre-emption provisions, those contractual obligations remain binding.
Shareholder agreements typically bind only the parties who signed them, unlike constitutional provisions which automatically bind all shareholders including future ones.
When pre-emption rights apply, companies must follow specific procedures to ensure shareholders receive proper notification.
Getting these procedures wrong can invalidate the share issuance and expose directors to personal liability.
When Should You Consider Removing Pre-emption Rights?
Not every company should rush to disapply pre-emption rights from their constitution.
The decision depends on your specific circumstances, growth plans, and shareholder composition.
Early-Stage Companies Seeking Multiple Funding Rounds
- Startups planning to raise venture capital across several funding rounds typically benefit from constitutional disapplication
- Each funding round without pre-emption flexibility requires a special resolution, creating administrative burden and potential deal delays
- Investors also view constitutional pre-emption rights as obstacles that complicate future fundraising
Companies with Stable Ownership
- Family businesses or companies with stable, long-term shareholders might prefer keeping statutory pre-emption rights
- These rights prevent surprise dilution and ensure all shareholders can participate proportionately in the company's growth
- When ownership composition is unlikely to change dramatically, the protection outweighs any flexibility concerns
Strategic Considerations
- Consider your medium-term capital needs before deciding whether to disapply pre-emption rights
- If you'll definitely need external investment within the next few years, removing pre-emption rights early simplifies future transactions
- If you're unsure about future capital needs, keeping pre-emption rights protects current shareholders until you have better visibility

Laura Ryan is a practising Barrister at the Bar of Ireland. She graduated from the Honourable Society of King’s Inns in 2024, having previously qualified and practised as a Chartered Accountant in a big four accounting firm.




%20(1).webp)


%20(1).webp)




