This article is for Irish business owners and shareholders who suspect someone isn't following your shareholder agreement.
If you're wondering whether a breach has actually occurred, what type of breach it is, and what you can realistically do about it, this guide covers how to identify breaches, the difference between material and technical violations, and your practical options from negotiation to court remedies.
Key Takeaways
• Material breaches like selling shares without pre-emption rights justify immediate legal action and full remedies including termination.
• Always negotiate before litigating shareholder disputes, as court victories often destroy business relationships more than the breach itself.
• Penalty clauses above 10% face strict scrutiny; document legitimate costs like legal fees to strengthen enforceability.
• You must prove damages with evidence showing losses directly resulted from the breach and were reasonably foreseeable.
• Courts grant specific performance for unique obligations like share transfers but not for ongoing duties requiring supervision.

How Do You Know If Your Agreement Is Being Breached?
A breach occurs when a shareholder fails to perform an obligation or acts contrary to restrictions in your shareholder agreement. This sounds straightforward, but identifying breaches requires careful analysis of what your agreement actually says versus what you think it should say.
Start by reading the specific provision you believe is being breached. Shareholder agreements use precise language.
Consider the context of the provision. Many shareholder agreements include conditions that must be met before obligations arise. For example, pre-emption rights might only apply when shares are offered "for sale to third parties."
If a shareholder transfers shares to their spouse as a gift, this might not trigger pre-emption rights depending on your agreement's specific wording.
What's the Difference Between Material and Technical Breaches?
Material breaches go to the heart of the agreement and fundamentally undermine its purpose. Technical breaches are minor violations that don't substantially affect the non-breaching party's rights or benefits under the agreement.
This distinction matters because it influences both available remedies and whether courts will grant relief.
Material breaches typically involve core obligations. Examples include:
- a shareholder selling shares in violation of pre-emption rights
- a director competing directly with the company when non-compete clauses apply
- disclosing confidential information protected by the agreement
These breaches justify immediate legal action and entitle you to full remedies.
Technical breaches involve procedural or minor substantive violations. Courts view these breaches less seriously and may award only nominal damages.
The practical effect differs substantially. Material breaches allow you to terminate the agreement in many cases, seek immediate injunctive relief, and claim substantial damages.
What Remedies Can You Pursue for Breaches?
Irish contract law provides several remedies for shareholder agreement breaches. Understanding each option helps you choose the most effective response for your situation.
Specific Performance
Specific performance is a court order requiring the breaching party to actually perform their obligations under the agreement.
This remedy works well for unique obligations that can't be adequately compensated through money damages.
Irish courts grant specific performance for:
- Share transfers where the shares have unique characteristics
- Enforcement of pre-emption rights that give shareholders priority to purchase shares
- Requirements to execute specific documents like share transfer forms or consents
Courts won't grant specific performance for every breach.
When specific performance is unavailable:
- Obligations requiring ongoing supervision, like requirements to attend monthly board meetings
- Requirements to provide regular reports or continuous services
- Situations where damages adequately compensate the non-breaching party
Damages
Damages compensate you for losses caused by the breach.
Irish courts award damages based on what's necessary to put you in the position you would have been in had the breach not occurred.
This is called the "expectation measure" of damages.
Proving damages requires evidence:
- Demonstrate that losses actually occurred
- Show the losses resulted directly from the breach
- Provide accounting evidence for financial losses
- Prove lost opportunities existed and would have materialized but for the breach
Vague assertions of harm won't succeed in court.
The doctrine of remoteness limits recoverable damages.
You can only claim losses that were reasonably foreseeable at the time the shareholder agreement was made.
Unusual or unforeseeable losses aren't recoverable even if they resulted from the breach.
Your duty to mitigate limits damages further:
- Take reasonable steps to minimize losses caused by the breach
- Avoid losses through simple actions when possible
- Courts reduce damages if you failed to mitigate when you reasonably could have
Injunctions
Injunctions are court orders requiring someone to do something (mandatory injunction) or stop doing something (prohibitory injunction).
These provide immediate relief before full trial of the breach claim. In shareholder disputes, injunctions commonly prevent share transfers, stop competitive activities, or protect confidential information.
Undertakings as to damages are required for injunctions. You must promise to compensate the other party if the court later determines the injunction shouldn't have been granted. This creates financial risk when seeking injunctions, particularly if you ultimately lose the case.
When Should You Negotiate Instead of Going to Court?
Negotiate first in almost every breach situation.
Litigation is expensive, time-consuming, and can destroy business relationships permanently.
Most shareholder disputes benefit from negotiation before considering legal action.
Business Relationships Matter More Than Being Right
Your company needs functional working relationships to survive and grow.
A court victory that destroys these relationships often costs more than the breach itself.
Negotiation preserves the possibility of continuing business operations together.
When Does Litigation Become Necessary?
Some situations require court intervention despite the costs.
Understanding when negotiation has failed helps you act decisively. When a shareholder is actively damaging the business or stealing assets, immediate court action becomes necessary.
A single breach might be resolved through discussion.
Repeated breaches demonstrate bad faith and unlikely improvement without court enforcement.
How Do You Enforce Penalty Clauses?
Penalty clauses in shareholder agreements face strict legal scrutiny under Irish law.
Understanding the difference between legitimate liquidated damages and unenforceable penalties is crucial.
Liquidated Damages vs Penalties
Irish courts will only enforce clauses that represent a genuine pre-estimate of loss.
A clause stating "€10,000 per day for breach" would likely be struck down as a penalty.
A clause stating "€10,000 to cover legal and administrative costs of breach" might be enforceable if reasonable.
The Burden of Proof Falls on You
You must demonstrate that the amount specified was a reasonable estimate of likely damages when the agreement was signed.
Courts examine the circumstances at the time of contract formation, not the actual loss suffered.
Disproportionate amounts compared to actual harm strongly suggest an unenforceable penalty.
Can You Forfeit Share Deposits?
Deposit forfeitures face similar enforceability challenges to penalty clauses.
Irish law distinguishes between genuine deposits and disguised penalties.
The 10% Rule Provides Safety
In commercial practice, deposits of around 10% are often treated as reasonable, but enforceability depends on context.
Amounts above this threshold face increasing scrutiny from courts.
Purpose Determines Enforceability
A deposit that compensates for genuine transaction costs is more likely to be upheld.
A deposit designed purely to punish non-performance may be struck down.
Document the Legitimate Purpose
When drafting deposit clauses, clearly state what costs the deposit covers.
Include administration, valuation expenses, legal fees, and opportunity costs.
This documentation strengthens enforceability if challenged in court.

Laura Ryan is a practising Barrister at the Bar of Ireland. She graduated from the Honourable Society of King’s Inns in 2024, having previously qualified and practised as a Chartered Accountant in a big four accounting firm.













